Navigation – Plan du site
Société

Soqotra: The historical formation of a communal polity

Serge D. Elie
p. 31-55

Résumés

L’île de Socotra, avant-poste lointain des frontières de l'État yéménite dans l'Océan Indien, est une communauté de composition ethnique mélangée, qui a sa langue propre. Elle offre un cadre sociopolitique idéal pour l'étude des relations entre État et collectivité en termes de formation politique. La formation politique de Socotra s’est réalisée à travers une série d'actes d'intégration politique menés par les différents régimes politiques qui se sont succédés depuis la fin du xixe siècle. L'étude de ce processus est accompagnée d’un récit historique de la politique administrative de quatre différents régimes dotés de modes de gouvernement politique distincts et ayant des effets structurants sur la vie collective des Socotri-s.

Haut de page

Texte intégral

1Soqotra Island is the main population center, with approximately 50,000 inhabitants, of the four-island Soqotra Archipelago, which extends the borders of the Yemeni state nearly 400 kilometers into the Indian Ocean. It is the largest island in the Arab Middle Eastern region, and its strategic geographical location as the gatekeeper to the entrance of the Red Sea, the gateway to the Middle East in the Indian Ocean as well as its middle ground position between Africa and Arabia, have attracted the attention of external political actors for centuries. Consequently, Soqotra’s historical transformation was driven primarily by a series of political incorporation acts into various state entities. This process of political incorporation may be said to have began in the seventh century B.C. when Soqotra (then known as Sakrad) was a plantation colony of incense-bearing trees inhabited by migrant laborers from eastern South Arabia and annexed to the ancient Kingdom of Hadramawt until the 4th century CE when both the incense trade and the kingdom began to decline (Casson 1989; Doe 1992; Robin 1997).  Subsequently, Soqotra seems to have mutated into a settlers’ colony, at least on the northern coast, made up of a mosaic population of immigrants, and seasonal vagrants, who shared the island with an indigenous people inhabiting the mountainous interior. These settlers turned it into a quasi-stateless peddlers’ emporium that was loosely linked to various mainland and foreign political overlords and subjected to occasional raiding parties and temporary occupation from state and non-state actors of all provenances, until the island’s final re-incorporation into the South Arabian Sultanate of Mahra during the 15th century (Elie 2006a). The focus of this article, however, is on the gamut of forms of political organization and polity regimentation that Soqotrans have encountered from the late 19th century to the present: First as a feudatory of the Sultanate of Mahra that was subsequently annexed by the British in the 19th century, and whose local rulers practiced by default the indirect rule of the absentee colonial overseer. Second, the newly established state of South Yemen, following independence from Britain in 1967, brought the Sultanate to an end and initiated Soqotra’s entry into the 20th century through a modernizing socialist experiment. Third, the unification of North and South Yemen in 1990 led to a hybrid administrative regime, which sought to tribalize the clan-based social organization and its civic traditions. Fourth, the post‑unity regime was launched with the adoption of a Local Authority Law in 2000 based on a World Bank inspired “good governance” re-configuration of local administration, which was preceded by Soqotra’s designation as a biodiversity reserve to be protected through a United Nations brokered environmental conservation regime.

2The aim of this article is to recount the history of Soqotra’s political incorporation through a series of state-directed processes of policy and administrative encompassment, as part of a broad contextualization of the institutionalization process of the islanders’ successive constitution into a sub-national/communal polity. In doing so, it retraces the historical layers of transferred institutions and their multiple effects on communal life in Soqotra. Also, it shows how these institutions were restructured through successive projects of political subordination, cultural assimilation, and socio-economic enclosure undertaken by various political regimes from the late 19th century to the present. Finally, this article offers a processual portrait of a community, with a mixed ethnic composition and a non‑Arabic mother tongue, undergoing a state incorporation process in which the combinatory effects of state policies and politics, institutions and actors have shaped the communal context of Soqotrans’ daily existence, and thus of their community’s historical trajectory. In effect, it is a narrative of the state’s politics of administration, which maps the socio-cultural and politico-economic interactions between local community, national society, the state and its international benefactors.  Moreover, it not only establishes the genealogy of the modern period in Soqotra through identifying the different phases of the island’s political incorporation, but also documents the transition process that has taken Soqotrans through a series of social mutations. In the following two sections of the article I seek: (1) to descriptively analyze the four phases of Soqotra’s political incorporation and the local adjustment effects; and (2) to highlight the ramifications of state-community relations in Soqotra under the current Yemeni state.

Four Historical Phases of Communal Polity Formation

3The description of Soqotra’s polity formation process starts from the period of enforced socio-economic stagnation under the Sultanate during the 19th century, followed by the independence of South Yemen in 1967, and Soqotrans inauguration into modernity and nation-state citizenship. This was followed by the national unification government in 1990, which initiated the transfer of northern Yemeni tribal ethos. This was succeeded by a post‑unity regime that heralded the institutional “modernization” of governance and an international economic integration process at the dawn of the 21st century. These four conjunctural shifts in Soqotra’s political incorporation and the associated administrative regimes represent the major markers of the island’s recent historical evolution: Sultanate fiefdom, Socialist administration, unity government, and post-unity regime. Their discussion amounts to an anatomy of Soqotra’s transition process, which simultaneously articulates the communal biography of Soqotrans in the form of a historical reconstruction of their polity formation process.

4The following discussion is structured around four aspects that together convey a comprehensive overview of the nature of the governance systems and their structuring effects on polity formation in Soqotra. These four aspects are the following: (i) historical context, which sets the stage by highlighting the circumstances of the regime’s emergence and its mode of governance; (ii) political geography characterizes each regime’s idiosyncratic territorial organization of the island for political administration; (iii) administrative modus operandi, which define the units of administration or political offices that underpin the governance system, and the  institutional mechanisms that articulate the mode of governance; and (iv) economic policy identifies the economic priorities and their social ramifications.

Sultanate Fiefdom: Tributary Patrimonialism

Feudal Dynasty

5Formal representation of the al-Afrâr Sultanate of Mahra on the southeastern coast of South Arabia was rather haphazard on the island, until 1480 when Mahri tribesmen disembarked from a flotilla of ten ships to take over, or more accurately to formalize as well as to militarize their heretofore informal presence on, Soqotra in their attempt to forestall the colonial ambition of their perennial rivals the Kathîrî and Qu‘aytî Sultanates in Hadramawt (Serjeant 1992: 161). They established a fort at al-Suq, which was then the capital village, and the main trading port, and where a garrison of armed Mahri tribesmen was maintained to collect the tribute imposed on the bedouins in the hinterland (Beckingham 1949). The Portuguese temporarily unseated the representation of al-Afrâr Sultanate, between 1507 and 1511. The latter reasserted its sovereignty upon the abandonment of the Portuguese short-lived colonizing venture. However, the new Mahri political overlord of the island seemed to have been present only intermittently, and used it for two purposes: (i) as a temporary refuge from their political enemies, as Ibn Majid, writing in the 15th century, explained, “to rally in it when they are weak and in danger from the Sultans of Hadramawt and others [e.g., the Omanis]” (Quoted in Serjeant 1992:144); and (ii) as a tax farm, which was the island’s principal purpose, that set a pattern in which Hadiboh and the other coastal settlements were merely used as tax collection nodes, and that lasted until the end of the Sultanate under the al-Afrâr dynasty. Soqotra was the first to have attracted British colonial interest, when in 1834 an offer to purchase the island was made to the Sultan ‘Amr bin Sa’d bin Tawarî ‘Afrâr of Mahra, but was rejected. However, the island’s unsuitability as a coaling depot led instead to the occupation and colonization of Aden in 1839, and subsequently to the creation, beginning in the 1880s, of a protectorate system incorporating a motley of political entities (i.e., emirates, sultanates, and sheikhdoms) in the western and eastern parts of South Yemen.  

  • 1  The above part of this paragraph is based on archive documents collected in Doreen and Leila Ingra (...)
  • 2  If the behavior of Soqotra’s last Sultan (‘Isâ bin ‘Alî 1952-1967) is any guide, then administrati (...)
  • 3  The term “foreigner” has a long and complicated genealogy in Soqotra. It was, and still is, part o (...)

6The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 rekindled British geo-political concerns and was the catalyst in its annexation of the island. Indeed, its strategic location in the newly opened trading route engendered the covetous intentions among powers potentially hostile to British interests in the Red Sea and Indian Ocean: for example, the Italian government wanted to acquire Soqotra for a penal colony, a French company sought to purchase it, and even Egypt’s Khedive was suspected of similar intentions. These menacing covetous dispositions of foreign powers occasioned British imperial anxieties that led them to conclude a protection treaty in 1876 specifically for Soqotra. Subsequently, in 1886, the British signed the “Protectorate Treaty with the Sultan of Socotra and Kishn”, which effectively incorporated both Mahra and Soqotra under British tutelage.1 In effect, these two treaties seemed to have guaranteed the territorial security and integrity of Mahra from its neighbors, and thus facilitated the shift of the administrative center of the Sultanate from the village of Qishn to Hadiboh (called Tamarida then), which turned Mahra into a neglected dependency of Soqotra.2 The transfer of the official seat of the Sultanate to Soqotra, which probably occurred in the 1890s, entailed the imposition of a tributary patrimonial rule under which the socio-political relations between Mahri Sultans and the Soqotran population were mediated by relations of conquest. Accordingly, the Sultans regarded the island’s territory and its resources as their eminent domain and were to be compensated through tax payments for the islanders’ use of these resources. This engendered and sustained a reciprocal animosity based on tax paying bedouins in the hinterland and rent seeking “foreigners” on the coast.3 In Soqotra, this tributary patrimonialism entailed a combination of the compulsory appropriation of a surplus from the pastoralist economy as tribute from bedouins, and a patrimonial mode of rule that extended patriarchal rule beyond the ruler’s private household and over a larger territory through the use of an administrative apparatus staffed with officials who were linked to the ruler on the basis of a kind of paternal authority (cf. Bendix 1977:360).

7This mode of governance also brought along an ascriptive social status hierarchy, which engendered mutual perceptions of ethno-social differences between local groups.  In Soqotra, this social stratification was articulated in a hierarchical division of labor based on an ascriptive relationship between status and occupation along the following criteria:

  • Tribal descent from the al-Afrâr tribe from Mahra as the exclusive marker for dynastic political hegemony of the Sultan’s family over the island, and assisted by a class of notables from the mainland, known as “shahro” (meaning people of the mountains), who were originally from a low status group in the Dhufar region in Oman and became servants of the Sultans in Mahra and were subsequently upgraded in Soqotra as the Sultan’s clients and main land owners with exclusive tax farming privileges;

    • 4  In contrast to the Zaidy sâda of north Yemen who considered themselves a spiritual  aristocracy of (...)

     Religious piety embodied in the ashrâf, who were thought to be endowed with innate spiritual powers, and who claimed descent from the Prophet’s family by way of Basra in Iraq through Tarim and Say’ûn in Hadramawt (al-Anbali 2007:102-3), as the sacerdotal class who legitimated the Sultanate’s nominal Islamic identity4;

  • Ethnicity, ‘arab essentially, which took on an economic hue, as those called Arab in Soqotra constituted a class of immigrant merchants from the Arabian Gulf region, who mediated the trade between the island, the Arabian Gulf and East Africa;

  • Scribal competence, the nûbân, a small group, in fact one extended family, of emancipated slaves who emerged under the last Sultan, and who constituted the administrative cadre of the Sultanate;

  • Occupational specialization based on socio-ecological particularities, the badû (bedouins), as transhumant pastoralists dwelling in the hinterland and who were the main taxpayers;

    • 5  Parts of the above paragraph are based on personal communication with Soqotri ethno-linguist Dr. M (...)

    Destitution engendered a sub-category of badû, especially from the more environmentally impoverished western part of the island, who were called akhdâm, free bedouin servants, and volunteered their services as irregular guards or herders to the Sultan in exchange for a part of the herd, food, and an annual gift of clothes5; and

  • Labor conscription, mostly  East African slaves (imbû‘îleh in Soqotri), who worked for some of the above groups.

Minimalist Apparatus  

8  During the Sultanate, Soqotra was a clan-based polity with a sparse population estimated at 11,220 in 1966, and which seemed to have shared a merely episodic memory (awaken during tax collection periods and irregular meetings with the Sultan) of being part of a larger entity beyond each individual clan’s territory. The population was thinly and widely dispersed throughout the island, and was congregated in caves and hamlets of a few rudimentarily built structures occupied by clusters of extended families constituting a clan collective. It was a settlement pattern that was suited to a form of pastoralism that entailed the extensive use of land as grazing ground, which sundered the landscape into an archipelago of isolated clan hamlets. These clan hamlets were not the infrastructural political units of a tribal superstructure, which did not exist in Soqotra. Instead, they primarily served as the basic fiscal units of the Sultanate. Footpaths and camel tracks provided the only communication grid between the regions of the island (Wellsted 1835; Bent 1900; Botting 1958; Brown 1966). The governance apparatus was not based on an elaborate administrative organization of the island, since tax collection was the main governmental function. The treaty of 1876 seemed to have provided an incentive to assert the Sultan’s authority over the island through a more sustained presence of the resident Governor in order to maximize tax revenues. By 1877, the British Assistant Political Resident in Aden, while on a visit to the island, “found that the execution of the treaty had strengthened the Governor’s hand, and that the revenue had doubled” (Hunter and Sealy 1909:113). The end result was the gradual consolidation of an administrative structure, which was captured in Douglas Botting’s (1958:65) description of the system of governance during his visit to the island in 1956: “The two of them [ministers Isâ and Ibrâhîm (al-Nûbân)] directed an administrative system consisting of four principal Muqaddams, or head-men, administering four principal tribal districts, and thirty to sixty lesser Muqaddams administering the sub-districts.” Botting’s description is briefly elaborated upon below:

9At the central level, which is in Hadiboh the capital village located on the northern coast, there was no sheikh system, as was the case on the mainland, but a cabinet of “ministers”, which constituted a State Council composed of five members and headed by “Prime Minister” Ibrâhîm al-Nûbî (Serjeant 1992:163). The members of this Council were selected by the Sultan based on competence, and they were not necessarily linked through kinship. At the regional level, there was a main representative of the Sultan, acting as regional muqaddam. This post seemed to have been occupied by notables from Mahri tribes, or someone with an elective kinship to the Sultan usually achieved through marriage. Finally, at the local level, or sub-district, the main office was that of the muqaddam, as clan leader. Each village and/or each clan, almost without exception, had its own muqaddam, and he would serve as the political representative of his clan, police officer, tax collector, conflict mediator, and manager of access to, and use of, natural resources. The social mobilization effect of this administrative apparatus was to consecrate the office of the muqaddam as the institutional gatekeeper of the clan structure, which made the clan the organizational pillar of Soqotrans’ communal life, and thus configured the island into an atomized clan-based polity.  

Mobile “Parliament” for an Atomized Polity

10While Hadiboh had its State Council, which was preoccupied with revenue generation from trade and external relations (mostly with British delegations), the rural areas had their own major institutional pillar, namely the “masilhim” (or in more authentic Soqotri “etihi a-sahatan”) in the form of a roving parliament. In effect, the masilhim was an event that consecrated the Sultan’s authority as part of a political ritual that sought to palliate the deep socio-economic inequities that were reified in two topographically bifurcated domains of existence: the mountainous hinterland where the overwhelming majority of the population practiced a subsistence transhumant milch pastoralism, and the coast where the Sultan and his privileged entourage engaged in rent extraction. This meeting was the major act of governance of the Sultanate, which had a multiplicity of functions. Most important was its public order-maintenance ritual, during which the Sultan’s power of coercion was put on public display as a dissuasive strategy: Limbs of thieves were amputated; whippings were carried out, among other fear-inducing acts (al-Anbali 2007:105-8). Indeed, fear was a fundamental part of the Sultanate governance strategy, as order maintenance was a challenge given the extreme deprivation of Soqotrans, who were plagued by perennial food insecurity and the constant threat of seasonal hunger, which drove some of them to commit desperate acts. This led to the persistence of animal theft, and land dispute, which were intrinsically related to each other: Theft was hunger driven, as people were stealing each other’s animals to survive while protecting their own herds. The land dispute arose out of counter claims over the construction of animal housing, which served to protect herds from thieves. It was this context that made the masilhim indispensable, as there was a constant need to dispense swift punishment if the social order was not to be overwhelmed by internal rebellion against the austere living conditions, which the Sultan was unwilling or unable to improve.

Tax Levying and Petty Mercantilism

11The Sultanate pursued a two-prong strategy of surplus generation, involving a combination of tax levying, which served as a production incentive for the bedouins out of fear of incurring the wrath of the Sultan for not paying taxes, and a form of petty mercantilism pursued through a system of selling monopoly rights to the Arab merchants who intermediated in the export and import of goods.

  • 6 Contrary to current recollection of the name “saqâ/tirâ”, as designating all Soqotrans, it was used (...)

12Regarding the tax levying system, the barter dominated herding economy restricted revenue generation to in-kind taxation of the main locally produced items: dates, ghee, and livestock. The incidence of taxes varied according to capacity to pay and seasonal availability of the taxed items, as both were contingent on nature’s whim (e.g., rain). There was a relative regional specialization in terms of the main items taxed due to the varying resource endowments of the different agro-ecological zones of the island. Accordingly, in the eastern part of the island, where most date palm trees were cultivated, the villagers paid with dates, although they were not exempted from supplying ghee (hami) as well, if they owned a sizable herd. However, it was in the west, which was the territorial domain of the authentic Soqotran bedouins, who were called saqâ/tirâ (sing. Saqa/trî), that taxes were collected more systematically.6 This was because in that part, livestock was the main resource and where ghee – the island’s cash crop and prized tax item – was produced in large quantity for export. In effect, Soqotran pastoralists – through the household production of ghee – participated in an inter-continental trade network, in which barter was the principal modality of exchange. Indeed, trade was a form of barter mediated by Arab merchants: the bedouins provided the ghee, the main but not exclusive exchange item, and the merchants exchanged it for requested imported items, cereal and cloth being the main but not exclusive goods. The standard bearer of value in this barter system was maize (maqdere) imported from East Africa and that was exchanged for ghee. The class of traders represented a relatively small number of Arab immigrant families, which were all congregated in a few settlements on the northern coast of the island: Hadiboh, Qadheb, and Qalansiyah being the most important locations. The main destinations for Soqotra’s exports and imports were the following: Oman, East Africa, and the western coast of India. It was in this context that the allocation of monopoly rights and the imposition of custom duties were operationalized under the supervision of the State Council.

13The status hierarchy was articulated with the Sultanate’s economic and fiscal extraction regime in the following manner: The first group, the “notables”, was made up of the Sultan’s kins and their clients who controlled land and many date plantations as well as slaves, and had tax farming privileges and authority positions in some regions of the island.  The second group could be called the “mercantilists”, who were from the Arabian Gulf and from Hadramawt, and constituted the main business intermediaries of the island. Their privilege consisted of being granted monopoly rights by the Sultan to trade in some commodities (e.g., pearl shells), and over the export and import of goods. The third group was the “rentier class” who constituted the political and administrative elite, as they were the members of the State Council. On behalf of the Sultan, they collected the taxes from the ports, negotiated the granting of monopolies, intermediated between the Sultan and the British, and received commission payments from the latter for the provision of labor gangs for the occasional public works they carried out (Serjeant 1992:166). In sum, this small‑scale tributary administration, which lasted until 1967, constituted a parasitic apparatus of fiscal extraction, established on the northern coast, and that was superimposed on an indigenous population of mostly transhumant pastoralists as tax tributaries dwelling in the hinterland, and the labor of African slaves residing in the coastal villages in the north.

Socialist Administration: Democratic Centralism

Undoing Indirect Rule

14“For 129 years they left our country, and especially our countryside, without the most basic features of modern life: roads and means of communications, schools, health units, and drinking water wells were virtually non-existent” (Ismael and Ismael 1986:110). This statement was the South Yemeni government’s assessment of the legacy of British rule, but it aptly describes as well the situation of Soqotra after 91 years of British “indirect rule.” The latter was a euphemism for the perverted practice of arrogating political authority without assuming the social welfare responsibilities it entailed, or as one scholar put it, an “imperialism of interference without responsibility” (Lewis quoted in Anderson 1987:5). Soqotra was an apt example of this practice, as Soqotrans’ needs were entirely neglected by the British and the Sultan. The British had conveniently assumed that Soqotrans were the responsibility of the Sultan, as any demonstration of concern on their part would be tantamount to interference with the Sultan’s prerogative. After all, they had already fulfilled their responsibility by paying a yearly rent of $360 per year to the Sultan, and for the use of parts of the island. Only a few opportunities for short-term employment through public works were provided during the construction of the infrastructural installations needed by the British military garrison located on the northern coast and was used as a base for allied forces during the Second World War (Elie 2006a:146-51). One British observer let out his exasperation at his government policy of neglect in South Arabia generally, and which aptly characterized the case of Soqotra, when he exclaimed, “[H]ad any other nation been masters of Aden, some more tangible result of our stay would have been shown… [I]t is the overseas portion of our Protectorate that has been so long and so systematically neglected” (Jacobs 1923:281-82).

15It was this chronic policy of neglect practiced by the absentee landlord of Soqotra that the new administration sought to undo. It initiated the transformation of the island through a “revolutionary decolonization” process, which sought not only to coerce Soqotrans into the modern world, but also to drastically reconfigure the island’s communal life: by uprooting the social legacies of the Sultanate’s feudal social status hierarchy; and by rectifying the corollary economic inequities. The emergence of this socialist administration was a politically agonizing process within the newly founded state.  And its spread to Soqotra was contingent on its progress on the mainland. Indeed, the first steps toward the modernization of Soqotra (i.e., roads, schools, health clinics, etc) were initiated after the “corrective step” (al-khu/twa al-ta/s/hî/hiyya) of June 1969 when the centrist President was ousted, and Marxism became conspicuously the basis of state policies (See Stookey 1982; Halliday 1990; Lackner 1985:60-78). This heralded a political transition from a radical nationalism to that of “scientific socialism”, which in turn entailed a deepening of the socialist transformation of South Yemen, and thus of Soqotra as well. Article 28 of the constitution promised that: “The state shall work for raising the standard of the underdeveloped areas with the aim of gradually obliterating the differences in the standard of living between the various parts of the republic” (Lackner 1985:127; Stookey 1982:69-71).

  • 7  In Yemen, muwallad (muwalladîn pl.) refers to someone born of intermarriage between an Arab (Yemen (...)

16The implementation of this constitutional clause, among others, in Soqotra heralded a period that Soqotrans described as the “coming of civilization” (/ha/dâra). This entailed the state’s deployment of polity regimentation measures as part of a nation-building process: compulsory education, conscription into military service, and the spread of Arabic as the communal lingua franca as a cultural strategy for the Arabization of the exclusively oral Soqotri culture as an administrative imperative. This initiated a state-sponsored language replacement process through the Arabization of the exclusively oral Soqotri culture as a cultural strategy that was driven more by expediency than by design; and which engendered a transition, still in progress, from a Soqotri-based culture of orality to an Arabic-based culture of literacy. Subsequently, Soqotra began its gradual emergence from a feudal enclave toward its still evolving modernization path. In effect, the South Yemeni state launched Soqotrans’ inaugural socialization as citizen of a modernizing nation-state; as it initiated the training of Soqotrans in the occupations needed by such a state, and fomented the generalized social inclusion of previously disenfranchised social categories. This led to the demise of the Sultanate’s ascriptive status hierarchy, the abolition of slavery, and the emergence of a new social group of former slaves and their descendents, the muwalladîn.7 In addition, the policy of eradicating rural-urban inequalities engendered a re-configuration of internal socio-cultural boundaries: from a spatial differentiation between hinterland and coast as an expression of divergent occupational identities, to a geographical bifurcation between east and west as indicative of contrary regional propensities toward participating in the cultural modernization initiated by the socialist administration.  

Dis-enclaving Grid

17The Soqotra landscape provided the socialist administration with a territorial re-organization challenge to its vision of the island’s new political geography. It was confronted with a residential pattern in which Soqotrans were distributed into hundreds of hamlets, each with a micro size population eking out a subsistence livelihood isolated in their respective ecological niches by a forbidding topography. In this context, the administration sought to develop urban nodal points in a rural-urban grid with Hadiboh as the strategic center. It was reorganized into an embryonic urban agglomeration to symbolize its importance in a new political geography of the island as well as to herald the inclusion of Soqotra into a common national culture and shared political history. This was done through the creation of neighborhoods named after the dates of major historical events that marked the nation-building itinerary of the two Yemeni states (Elie 2005:69-70). Beyond Hadiboh, a few emergent urban formations were established in different regions of the island. These embryonic secondary towns were to act as attracting poles to the hinterland in an attempt to partially drain it of its surplus population. In effect, their implantation in an overwhelmingly rural landscape that was based on the awareness that modernization could not be achieved through the agency of subsistence agropastoralists or cave dwelling bedouins unaided by an urban vanguard. This was further abetted by a Marxist theory-inspired ideological antagonism vis-à-vis the traditional social structure (whether it was tribalism on the mainland or clanic bedouinism in Soqotra), which was seen as a major impediment to societal transformation.

18The establishment of urban centers was accompanied by the reorganization of villages within re-configured regional areas, as part of an island-wide integration process that would link isolated clans to larger communal groupings and to the mainland state. These preliminary steps toward the spatial and social re-configuration of the island were linked to the state’s need for a bureaucratic apparatus to carry out the administrative functions (e.g., census taking, local elections, committee creation etc) to prepare Soqotrans for political citizenship in the socialist state. A crucial part of this dis-enclaving process was the construction of the first island-wide network of car tracks, through the roads cutting initiative (shaq al-/turuqât), for transportation and communication link between rural and urban parts of the island. This initiated an internal migration from the mountains to the internal plains, as the bedouins gradually but not completely abandoned their cave habitat for built structures in the proximity of the tracks.

Hierarchical Committee System for Self-Rule

19Hadiboh was designated the capital of the newly constituted district (mudîriyya)of Soqotra. It was within the jurisdiction of Aden, the first out of the six provinces, or governorates, of the new state of South Yemen. The head of the district was the mâmûr (governor), who was initially occupied by, and has ever since remained, a mainland Yemeni, and was assisted by two Soqotran deputies. This troika administered the island through a hierarchical committee system, linking the central, regional and local/village levels: At the central level there was the District Committee of the Socialist Party (lajnat al-mudîriyya li-l-/hizb al-ishtirâkî), with  overall responsibility for the island, and which constituted the executive committee assisting the ma’mûr in its governing tasks. The mudîriyya was divided into two administrative centers (markaz idârî), Hadiboh and Qalansiyah, and the two deputies of the ma’mûr were responsible for them. There were two more committees: The first was the Central Committee for Popular Defense (lajnat markaz al-difâ’ al-sha’bî), which was, in effect, the island’s political security and ideological correctness oversight authority. The second was the neighborhood committee (lajnat al-wa/hda al-sakaniyya), but only for Hadiboh and Qalansiyah, which were the only two urban agglomerations. For the rural areas, there was the village committee (lajnat al-qarîya), headed by a locally selected chairperson with a deputy and about five additional members. There were nearly forty of such committees representing the different sub-regional areas of the island. This committee was an area wide entity agglomerating a group of villages as well as clans within a region, as a means of disbanding the previous local administrative structure based on clan affiliation.

  • 8  This paranoia of sovereignty was symbolized in the State Security Law adopted in 1975, which made (...)

20The administrative system described above was adapted to the Soqotra context from the one established throughout the territory of the South Yemeni state. It was inclusively participatory, as part of a rather coercive strategy of forming the subjects of socialist emancipation through the ideological permeation, if not behavioural regulation, of clan members into administered denizens of an emergent state. More importantly, perhaps, was the need to institutionalize the new system in a manner that would ensure its social reproduction. This was attempted through the creation of a “civil society” by government-sponsored mass organizations: women’s union, youth union, defense union, etc. Their role was to be the catalyst for the spread of revolutionary consciousness.  This fostering of social inclusion through the ideological regimentation of Soqotrans seemed to have been mainly intended to achieve maximum political control by the center. This centralizing urge was motivated by a surveillance imperative, induced by a phobia of imagined enemies of the revolution. In effect, the local self-rule that was being promoted turned out to be on behalf of the state, and in response to its paranoia of sovereignty and control.8

Subsidized Consumption

21The socialist administration’s socio-economic policy was based on the provision of the population’s basic needs through subsidized consumption. This policy encompassed the following priorities, which constituted a comprehensive social policy framework: Primary education, generalized access to essential food stuffs and basic consumer items, land redistribution as a means to employment generation through the commercial exploitation of natural resources, and infrastructure development (Ismael and Ismael 1986:110-28; World Bank 1979). These priorities were framed within a societal vision of accelerated modernization of both rural and urban areas. The implementation effects of only two of these socio-economic goals on the Soqotran community are highlighted below:

  • 9  The intifâ/dât were initially a land redistribution instrument deployed by politically organized l (...)

22The availability of the food items engendered change both in local consumption habits and in the production of Soqotra’s cash crop, ghee, which was exchanged for imported goods. The symbiotic nexus between the consumption of one of the key food items in the Soqotran diet (i.e., maize) imported from East Africa and the production for export of ghee was broken; as the Sultanate’s trade with East Africa was abandoned and maize was replaced by rice imported from elsewhere. This resulted in the discontinuation of ghee production for export, and the corresponding relegation of pastoralism from core to supplementary economic activity. Employment generation was linked to a land re‑distribution policy that was based on the land dispossession clause in Article 19 of the 1970 Constitution, which stipulated that the land confiscated from the rulers of the previous regime “shall be utilized by farm workers, poor farmers and citizens migrating from the towns and deserts” (Ismael and Ismael 1986:84). This led to an internal population redistribution, albeit not on a massive scale, from the hinterland to the coast, which entailed the reconfiguration of the population composition of coastal villages and some degree of sedentarization. The purpose was to promote fishing and farming as alternative means of livelihood to an increasingly non-economic pastoralism. Accordingly, the transformation of fishing from a subsistence activity to an economic exchange activity was initiated in the 70s, following the National Front organization of local fishermen ‘uprisings’ (intifâ/dât al‑/sayyâdîn),9 when the Ministry of Fish Wealth began to support the development of a fishing sector through the establishment of Soqotra’s Fishing Cooperative (jamî’iyat Suqu/trâ al‑samakiyya) through which the government’s purchase the fish for sale abroad. This guaranteed an income to fishermen and made fishing an attractive alternative to pastoralism. Indeed, fishing was promoted as an integral part of local folklore through the official annual celebration of the “Day of Fishermen Uprising.”  

23In sum, the economic policy of subsidized consumption of imported goods was necessary in the short term given Soqotrans’ extreme state of deprivation.  However, the long term impact has been the partial weaning away of Soqotrans from primary dependency on their herds as their main source of livelihood, and the consequent abandonment of their rigorous animal husbandry system. However, given the small scale nature of the fishing cooperatives, no sustainable economic alternative was provided to the subsistence pastoralism that continued to sustain, albeit inadequately, the majority of Soqotrans. Moreover, the socialist economy had a strong urban bias, which benefited the new class of urban-based bureaucrats that was created to run the administrative machinery. Indeed, a job in this bureaucracy was guaranteed to all secondary school graduates. However, the majority of Soqotrans continued to live by the meager productivity of their herds, the occasional public works jobs, and through local recruitment into the army and police.

Unity Government:Tribal Libertarianism

Tribal Inter-Regnum

24 The long deferred dream among mainland political actors of a unified Yemeni state was finally realized in May of 1990. The consolidation of this unified state brought out a sigh of political relief from Soqotrans, as they no longer had to live under the threat of suspicion of having divided political loyalty. The relief was, however, temporary, as they had to endure the overhauling of their political and institutional set up with the introduction of the ni/zâm al-mashâyikh (sheikh system), which was part of a state-led tribalization process as a civic incorporation strategy. This strategy involved the wholesale transfer of the tribal social structure in north Yemen with its civic tradition based on an administrative vernacular of tribes and sheikhs, as a means of agglomerating the clan-based muqaddam system into regional tribal groups. In effect, this transfer sought to transform the organic clanism that previously existed into an instrumental tribalism that would foment a new tribal consciousness infused with state allegiance, as the organizational means for the population’s political manipulation. It is in this light that I use the term tribal libertarianism, which refers to a social system in which political allegiance is merely a private contractual obligation with the dominant or monopolistic agency, i.e., the state; and where public law is substituted, at least in part, by a network of private agreements between the state and groups of clients (Rawls 1996:262-65). To confound matters, this tribal libertarianism was articulated with the practice of multi-party electoral politics that started in the 1990s.

  • 10   These initial decrees sought not only to replace the feudal practices of the Imamate’s tribal coo (...)

25In effect, the newly introduced sheikh system represented an experimental search for an effective incorporative solidarity vis-à-vis an unfamiliar political formation, and it was based on north Yemen’s experience with nation-state building following the 1962 Revolution, which engendered a tribe-dependent political system. This end result was due to the institutional re-organization and the social mobilization effects engendered by the political decisions taken by state leaders at a particular historical conjuncture. In fact, soon after the Revolution, the government promulgated a number of decrees that sought to institutionalize the role of tribes vis-à-vis the state Starting, in 1963, many tribes related institutions were established: Tribal Sheikhs Councils (majâlis shuyukh al-qabâ’il) in all of the provinces of the new northern state, the Central Committee for Tribal Affairs (al-lajna al‑markaziyya li-shu‘ûn al-qabâ’il), and the Ministry of Tribal Affairs (wizârat shu‘ûn al-qabâ’il). The latter was replaced in 1968 by the Tribal Affairs Authority (ma/sla/hat shu‘ûn al-qabâ’il), which is still today the main liaison entity between the state and the tribes (Tarbush 2003).10 This engendered a transition from an autonomous tribalism to an incorporated tribalism, which was dubbed “republican tribalism” (Halliday 1974). As a result, for the next three decades the dominant political orientation of the new republic was to remain preoccupied with placating tribal forces, and thus the institutional modernization of the new republic was characterized by the quest for a domestic balance of forces between “tribalists” and “modernists” (Burrowes 1987). This led to the transmutation of tribes from local self‑defense associations, and occasional mercenary force to the highest bidder, to a heavily armed and mobilized countervailing power that was financially subsidized by, and promoted as privilege political interlocutor to, the state. In effect, they were consecrated as the preeminent national power broker in the emergent civil-political society of the Yemen Arab Republic, given the constitutional ban on the formation of political parties from 1970 to 1990. A preeminence that was rivaled only by the emergent Sunni Islamist movement that culminated into the formation in 1990 of the Islamist political party Islah. Subsequently, there emerged a triumvirate of political actors – the military, the tribes and the Islamists – that was to determine the nature of the unification of the two Yemeni states through an “annexationist politics” as well as continued to influence the politics of the unified Yemeni state to the present (al-Saqqaf 1999; Schwedler 2002).

  • 11  The delay in introducing the ni/zâm al-mashâyikh was due to the institutional inertia generated by (...)
  • 12  I am referring to the set of regulatory mechanisms (qawâ‘id) in relations among tribes: shûrâ (con (...)

26This was the background to the Yemeni state’s use of the ni/zâm al-mashâyikh as the incorporation strategy of Soqotra. The demise of the enforcement apparatus of the socialist committee system led to the political demobilization of the hinterland population and a reversal to its clan organization. This facilitated the introduction of the sheikh system, which was inaugurated with the establishment of the office of majlis al-mashâyikh (sheikhs’ council) in Hadiboh in 1995.11 This led to the reorganization of village committees into village councils headed by the newly created post of sheikh. The state-sponsored sheikh system revised the deferential connotation customarily associated with the term “sheikh” – which was used solely in reference to a religious leader (i.e., the ashrâf), or as an honorific vis-à-vis the notables – into a political one by linking it to a tribal political leader. This created a new political hierarchy: the sheikh at the apex, seconded by his personal assistant (mu‘âwin), supported by the village ‘âqil (wise man), and his executant the muqaddam. In practice, the sheikh system was an attempt to organize the clans’ relationship to the state according to a patron-client model. However, this state-engineered tribalism was not based on the institutional pillars of the socio-political order associated with organic tribalism as they were non-existent in Soqotra and never took roots on the island.12

27In contrast, Soqotran “tribes” were not political entities, but merely mutual aid “kin assemblages” whose social cohesion was based on the ecological constraints of livelihood making in a context of scarce environmental resources. In fact, the Soqotri concept of “tribe” is a semantic modification of the Arabic term sha/tr (part, section, or segment) to which was attached a Soqotri suffix shatrihir: which means strips from a cloth. This aptly captures the amoeba-like sub-division process of Soqotra’s clan formation, in contrast to the aggregative process of tribes’ formation. The non-aggregation of Soqotran clans was an ecological adaptation to the spatial requirement of a pastoralism based on an extensive land use strategy. The state’s attempt at transforming Soqotran clans into a segmentary polity of tribes was not successful. This was partly because the resources available from the state were never significant, as Soqotra was neither an important economic prize, nor constituted a potentially significant political threat to necessitate the distribution of state resources as part of a cooptation exercise. Consequently, the state-engineered socio-organizational metamorphosis of Soqotrans into a tribal polity was not realized, but merely complicated communal administration.

Territorial Segmentation

28The political significance of the territorial organization of the island into geographical regions demarcated into sub-regional areas agglomerating clusters of villages, which became important during the socialist administration in its de-clanification strategy, was to assume even greater importance in the tribalization of Soqotra’s clans. In effect, the ni/zâm al-mashâyikh (NM) represented a counter-permeation strategy, as every previously established structure had to be reclaimed by the new system. The formalization of this system was through the central government’s approval and remuneration of sheikhs for each of the forty-three sub-regional areas of the island.  However, the demarcation of the island into segmented sheikhdoms did not create a segmentary polity, but only engendered a level of segmentary political competition, not between clan collectives, but between individual men who presumed that their personal status or prior political experience earned them the right to vie for the position of sheikh, and in some cases were aided and abetted by competing political parties. This lent an aggressive and anarchically competitive dimension to local governance, as former chairpersons of village committees began vying for the post of sheikh. At the base of the NM was the ensemble of muqaddams, as clan representatives, who performed the same functions under all previous regimes, and remained the traditional and foundational pivot of all governance systems on the island. Under the NM, all of the muqaddams in each of the designated sub-regional areas would form a sort of temporary electoral college to select the sheikh for their respective regions. The selected sheikhs would select a supreme leader of all of them on the island called shaykh al-mashâyikh. The area sheikhs’ main function was the maintenance of social order through conflict resolution. They were the eyes and ears of the court (ma/hkama) and the prosecutor’s office (niyâba). The supreme sheikh managed the entire system by maintaining the official list of area sheikhs, assisting in their selection, distributing salary, and liaising with the Department of Tribal Affairs Authority in Sana’a, which has oversight responsibility for the NM in the whole of Yemen.

Parallel Rule

29Following the dissolution of the socialist administrative apparatus the new government administration was reduced to four main offices located in the capital, Hadiboh: General Director (al-mudîr al-‘âm) formerly al-ma’mûr, his deputy, the court, and the prosecutor’s office. All links with the rest of the island were taken over by the sheikh system. It was an anomalous arrangement, as the latter was the governing institution at the local level, while simultaneously being independent of local government in Hadiboh. The NM functioned as a parallel governing institution to the district level administrative machinery, as it provided the local organizational infrastructure upon which the island’s administrative center had to rely. This created an internal wedge between the island’s administrative center in Hadiboh and its rural periphery. As a result, the NM permeated the society more thoroughly than the formal government machinery. In effect, the NM was a variant of indirect rule on behalf of the local political interests of the executive branch of the national government. This was done through the Department of Tribal Affairs, which managed the NM in Soqotra, as everywhere else in Yemen (World Bank 2006: 35-39). This office’s main responsibilities were to officialize the list of sheikhs locally selected, the preparation of the individual stamps that is the main symbol of an official sheikh, the distribution of honorarium, among other tasks related to the furthering of the interests of the ruling party. In effect, the NM was inscribed into a strategy that was linked to the political imperatives created by the emergence of party politics after unification, and thus of the need to enhance the prospects of the ruling party to hold on to power.

Government Sponsored Growth

30The imperative of stabilizing the fusion of the two divergent administrative systems that underpinned the newly unified state led the unity government to adopt an economic policy of employment generation through government posts creation. It was a form of over‑employment, in which the governmental posts of the two administrations were maintained to ensure job security, as a co-optation strategy that would minimize opposition to, or at least palliate the disruptive economic consequences of, the unification process. This led to the accelerated recruitment of teachers, health workers and office clerks who had completed secondary school, and the expansion of the police force, which attracted pastoralists with primary school education from the hinterland escaping the arduous life of a bedouin, and the underclass (muwalladîn) in the coastal areas seeking an additional source of income to seasonal fishing. The end result of this public sector employment generation strategy was the “Soqotrification” of the public sector work force and thus the creation of a permanent class of local government functionaries.

31Moreover, the lifting of the economic restrictions imposed by the socialist administration enabled the starting up of private sector activities. This sector, which was made up of a handful of home front stores under the Sultanate, and was slightly expanded but tightly regulated under the socialist administration, was allowed to expand after unification. The latter inaugurated a period that Soqotrans called “al-infitâ/h” (the opening), which occasioned a minor exodus of surplus labor from all over the mainland, as migrants sought to take advantage of the new economic opportunities on the island. Consequently, Soqotra became the Eldorado of the economically marginalized from the mainland. The end result of their influx was the plethora of micro-capitalist ventures symbolized in the ubiquitous presence of the grocery or variety shop in almost every built structure in Hadiboh, and to a lesser extent in Qalansiyah. Their trading activities have brokered the gradual, yet inexorable, integration of Soqotrans into a monetized consumer economy.

Post-Unity Regime:Globalizing Local Governance

Globalization Encounter

32At the dawn of the 21st century, the Government of Yemen enacted into law a comprehensive reform of its governance system, namely the Local Authority Law of 2000. This reform was aimed at decentralizing the administrative apparatus and delegating authority and power to locally elected representatives. The impetus for the adoption of this Law was not solely a matter of national political will to decentralize and democratize the management of local affairs, but also, if not primarily, the result of international pressure (World Bank 1999). With the parliament’s approval of the Law in February of 2000, the government declared its formal adoption of the internationally sponsored discourse on good governance and democratization. In April of the next year elections were held in all of the local districts (333) in Yemen including Soqotra; thereby institutionalizing the Local Council (LC) system as a relatively new form of political administration since unification. The law’s key objectives are spelled out in Article 4: “This Law shall be based on the principles of financial and administrative decentralization, and shall operate on the basis of broadening popular participation in decision making and in the administration of local affairs in social, economic and cultural development through the elected local authority.”  

33In effect, this administrative reform institutionalized electoral politics at the local/communal level, formerly the arbitrary preserve and hereditary rule of sheikhs. The purpose was to adjust the political administration of the whole of Yemen so that it conformed to the pre-requisites of multiparty electoral politics, and to mainstream the sheikh system into a legally sanctioned and publicly vetted decision-making process. Some of the ramifications of the introduction of the LC were: (a) to integrate the parallel sheikh system within the mainstream administrative machinery by making them a counterpart of the local councilors and to share responsibility for the areas within their jurisdiction; (b) to introduce an electoral system in the selection of local representatives in lieu of the politically arbitrary nomination process; and (c) to establish a local planning and managerial capacity for government funded and internationally supported development projects. In this context, the LC represents the ruling party’s strategy of accommodating a politically competitive national context, while allaying international concern about local managerial transparency. The latter was the sine qua non for donor funding of environmental conservation projects in Soqotra.

  • 13  However, in the fall of 2008, the Hadiboh Local Council members successfully petitioned the Govern (...)

34The institutionalization of this LC system provided the fundamental frame of reference for the island’s administrative re-structuring through the state’s deployment of a strategic gaze upon its territorial organization, and enhanced the value of local office holders at the lowest levels, if only during elections and mostly as convenient  allies in getting out the vote. The introduction of the local council system was meant to empower local communities through the decentralization of decision-making authority as well as the provision of the financial means to implement the decisions taken. In practice, however, it is a mechanism for external supervision. The main office holder at the district level in Soqotra, the Director General (al-mudîr al-‘âm) is selected not through election but by political appointment, as stipulated in Article 81 of the Local Authority Law. While the law does not mentioned that the incumbent should not be selected from the local community; as a rule, however, it is filled by an outsider.13

Electoral Cartography

35The consecration of electoral politics as the privileged means of selection for public office led to the reconfiguration of Soqotra’s landscape. Planning for elections became the most meticulous civic operation on the island that was led by Soqotrans, as part of a state mandated ritual of citizenship re-affirmation. This meticulosity was manifested (a) in the preparation of detailed hand-drawn regional maps, in which the voting stations of every sub‑district are shown, and (b) in the higher reliability of voters’ registry than the population census, since the accuracy of the former is the political obligation of every local official and the civic duty of every citizen. The control mania of the socialist administration with its micro-organizational urge to include every comrade into its socialist experiment was replaced by an electoral mania of the post-unity regime with its phobia against the exclusion of potential voter-citizen; although this was primarily motivated by the government’s quest for political legitimacy. Furthermore, partly out of concern for parity in political representation, the island was sundered into two districts: the Eastern District, with Hadiboh as its capital, encompassing three fourth of the island’s territory as well as population (34,011 people in 512 villages); and the Western District, with Qalansiyah as its capital, was allocated the remaining space and inhabitants (10,109 people in 117 villages). Each district was evenly organized into five centers (pl. marâkiz) with each center encompassing clusters of villages for the purpose of demarcating an electoral base and identifying the jurisdiction of members of the local council. The selection of these centers were apparently done on the basis of their geographical location within the district, and according to their infrastructural resources (i.e., mosque, school, or clinic), and population density. The number of councilors per district was based on a formula in the law that stipulates “A district with a population of 35,000 people or less shall have a local council of eighteen members.” The end result of this election mediated re-configuration of the island was the super-imposition of thirty-six councilor’s wards over the forty-three areas under the jurisdiction of sheikhs and the hundreds of muqaddams and their clan collectives distributed through the approximately 623 villages and hamlets of the island.

External Supervision

36A pyramidal maze of institutions that have pledged allegiance to the neo-liberal credo of good governance constitutes the externally controlled supervisory framework for Soqotra’s internal administration. This hierarchy of institutions include the international donors (i.e., IMF, WB, EU and UN), the national bureaucracy (especially a troika of ministries: Planning and International Cooperation, Water and Environment and Environmental Protection Authority), the regional Governorate of Hadramawt, and the local council. Collectively, however, they constitute an institutional web of insufficiently coordinated functions, uneven resource (human and financial) allocation, and a chronic discrepancy between centralized authority (political and budgetary) in the executive branch and diffused responsibility (service delivery and monitoring) in the public bureaucracy. Over a decade of donor tutorials in good governance (e.g., World Bank’s “civil service modernization” and UNDP’s “Decentralized Local Governance” projects) has yet to significantly diminish the effectiveness gap of state institutions, or the accountability deficit of the state (Ard 2004). Moreover, the national public administration system remains hampered by the institutionally endemic centralization of power in the executive branch, which has prevented the actualization of the objectives of the Local Authority Law. As one World Bank report explains, the reason for this “is rooted in the regime’s central dilemma: how can the political leadership guarantee that the reform will be carried out properly and the results serve the purpose of maintaining the regime?” (World Bank, 2007: 18-19).

37Consequently, the chronic centralization reflex of the central government was replicated in the relations between regional and local governments. Accordingly, the local council of the Governorate of Hadramawt, which has executive oversight over all of the twenty-nine districts including Soqotra’s two districts within its jurisdiction, mediates all decisions between the central governmental branches and the districts. Thus, no district is allowed to petition directly the central government. As a result, Soqotrans feel doubly marginalized: first by geographical distance and second by an added decisional layer, which deprives them of direct access to the central government and engenders chronic delays in the services provided. Ultimately, the proper functioning of the entire system rests on the performance of the local councilor, and who represents the potential Achilles’ heel of Soqotra’s modern democratic governance system. This is because the local councilor is an unremunerated voluntary post, and the incumbent only receives a stipend for attending quarterly meetings. Lastly, while the Local Authority Law granted Soqotrans individual political rights to participate in the management of their community, this participatory entitlement was in practice rescinded by the central government appointment of the Director General without consulting with Local Council members, while expecting their post-facto acquiescence.

Eco-Developmentalism

38As the post-unity government sought, or more aptly was constrained, to integrate the international financial system, the economic policy of public sector growth that brokered its political consolidation in the immediate aftermath of unification was considered a liability to the country’s economic solvency soon thereafter. This led to the adoption in the mid‑1990s of a World Bank and IMF supervised neo-liberal economic reform programme, which has remained ever since the government’s guiding economic frame of reference (World Bank 1995). Subsequently, state-society relations were to be increasingly mediated by neo-liberal principles; thus communities had to lower their expectations of government, and to depend more on international development assistance, and private sector initiatives. The end-result was that the government’s local economic strategy shifted from employment generation through public sector jobs to infrastructure development (e.g., airport, seaport, asphalted roads network, etc). Soqotra had a comparative advantage that could facilitate its adaptation to this new economic context, namely its endemic flora, which was ranked as the tenth richest among the world’s oceanic islands, and earned it the rather hyperbolic designation “the Galapagos of the Indian Ocean.” It was Soqotra’s ecological mystique that the government sought to promote as an internationally marketable resource, when it ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1996. This act effectively heralded the government strategy of eco-developmentalism, namely the transformation of Soqotra into an international biodiversity reserve, a scientific research station, a destination for ecotourism, and a model of sustainable development that straddles tradition and modernity in a symbiotic embrace.

39The existential défi confronting Soqotrans and their island was, on the one hand, a development imperative of a human population characterized by a high level of material deprivation that must be remedied; and on the other the environmental challenge of a place with a unique biodiversity of global significance that should be preserved. It was in response to this set of challenges that the formulation of a biodiversity conservation-with-sustainable development strategy was undertaken by the UN. This strategy was launched in 1998 with the implementation of the island’s first environmental conservation project. The latter formulated the Soqotra’s Biodiversity Zoning Plan that proposed a binding environmental regime for the island that was decreed into law in 2000, and which effectively transformed the island into a protected national park and conscripted Soqotrans as its unwitting custodians.  Moreover, this decree enabled a process of transnational supervision, in which the environmental assets or ecological endowments, and the spatial configuration of a place are turned over to the stewardship of international agents, who imposed a disciplinary environmental regime – inadequately informed by local environmental sensibilities – that censors the relationship between locals and their livelihood domains.

40After nearly ten years of implementing this internationally led eco-development experiment, the current economic configuration of the island is still at an impasse: a state‑dependent communal economy with the local government bureaucracy as main employer and social service provider in the main urban centers, since the embryonic private sector has limited employment generation prospects; while the rest of the coastal population is engaged in seasonal fishing that was, until recently, under monopsony conditions imposed by mainland buyers; and  the population of the hinterland eke out a subsistence livelihood from a pastoralism of diminishing economic sustenance. This is complemented by the haphazard assistance of international agencies implementing micro-scale projects of limited duration, scope and sustainability, and seasonal jobs as tourist guides for those who speak English or have a car to rent. Finally, for the lucky few with relatives in the Gulf diaspora they participate in a supplemental economy of in-kind remittance dependency.

Conclusion: The Challenge of Cultural Recognition

41Since the end of the Sultanate, the evolution of Soqotra’s polity and the mutation of its internal socio-economic and politico-cultural context as well as its physical landscape have been intimately related to Yemen’s nation-building processes and the state’s expansion and consolidation of its political authority. The above narrative of the successive forms of governance introduced on the island has shown that local history was brokered through different phases of state-community relations. These have engendered a rapid succession of types of polity that Soqotrans incarnated: from tax-paying bedouin subjects under the social neglect of the Sultanate, then as revolutionary comrades under the socio-political regimentation of the socialist administration, to be subsequently constituted into competing tribes for the selective and haphazard attention under the sheikh system of the unity government, and finally as muwâ/tinîn (citizens) under condition of centrally supervised communal management under the post-unity regime.  

  • 14  In anticipation of the selection of Soqotra as a UNESCO World Natural Heritage Site, which occurre (...)

42The cumulative effect of this political incorporation process – characterized by the rapid succession of political regimes and the divergent political identities they promoted – is the incomplete national-cultural integration of Soqotrans. This partial integration was exacerbated by the island’s geographical location, which has made Soqotrans the nation’s orphans, given the geographical chasm between the island and the mainland. Moreover, Soqotra’s shared jurisdiction between the central government’s ministries, the Governorate of Hadramawt, and international agencies has led to administrative and policy incoherencies. The local effects of these incoherencies have left Soqotrans in a quandary as to where they fit in the national scheme of things: democratic virtues (administrative decentralization, electoral politics, etc) are vitiated by their underpinning structures; main economic activities (e.g., infrastructure development) are determined by state sponsored contractors’, not local interests; development interventions are based on donors’, not Soqotrans’, priorities; and institutions (e.g., health and education) are established without the means (human and financial) to become operationally effective. Fortunately, ways to effectively address these administrative challenges are being investigated by the by the committee responsible for reviewing Soqotra’s administrative status headed by the Ministry of Water and Environment14.

  • 15  In the summer of 2009, the Ministry of Culture presented a proposal entitled, “Project for the Est (...)

43However, unaddressed, thus far, is the challenge of the cultural recognition of the Soqotran community as an ethno-linguistic minority. This is evident in the state’s policy vacuum vis-à-vis the preservation of local culture, which amounts to a kind of neo-liberal cultural policy by default. The end-result is the literal abandonment of Soqotrans to their own uncoordinated private initiatives with limited international assistance (e.g., small public library, Soqotri poetry competition, adaptation of the Arabic script to the Soqotri language, a museum, etc). The challenge that this situation presents is that of promoting the harmonious co-existence between communal cultural self-definition with the dominant national culture within the framework of consolidating national political unity and regional ethno-cultural heterogeneity. It is in this context that the adoption of a policy of cultural recognition assumes its importance, as it calls for protecting “the integrity of the individual in the life contexts in which his or her identity is formed” (Habermas 1994:113), which does not entail the renunciation of communal cultural particularities as a pre-condition to national belongingness. What is particularly attractive about Soqotra as a community, to which such a policy could be applied, is that it is composed of a population among which there is not the slightest manifestation of interest in the formation of any kind of autonomous political entity. Furthermore, there is neither a historical nor a legal basis for any claim by any other state against the legitimacy of the Yemeni state’s sovereignty over the island. Therefore, there is no currently existing or potential threat that could induce political nervousness or security concerns about, for example, the Soqotri language being used as a cultural pretext for claims to regional autonomy. Indeed, given the current emphasis on Soqotra as a touristic destination, promoting its cultural and linguistic particularities would enhance the island’s attractiveness not only for its biodiversity but also its cultural diversity. The official adoption of a policy of cultural recognition could be pursued as an integral part of the Ministry of Culture’s new initiative to establish cultural development centers around the country.15 This would confirm Soqotrans’ status as an ethno-linguistic indigenous people that would enrich the cultural patrimony of Yemen, and transform them into a communal polity of active stakeholders imbued with a sense of ownership in shaping their collective destiny.

Haut de page

Bibliographie

Al-Anbali A.

2007 : Târîkh jazîrat Suqu/trâ, UAE, Matba‘a Al Sahaba.

Anderson L.

1987 : “The State in the Middle East and North Africa”, Comparative Politics, 20:1, 1-18.

Ard, Inc.

2004 : Democracy and Governance Assessment in Yemen, Washington, DC, USAID.

Beckingham C. F.

1949 : “Some early Travels in Arabia”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 314: 155-76.

Bendix R.

1977 : Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait, Berkeley, University of California.

Bent T. & M.

1900 : Southern Arabia, London, Smith, Elder & Co.

Botting D.

1958 : Island of the Dragon’s Blood, London, Hodder & Stoughton.

Brown G. H.

1966 : Social and Economic Conditions and Possible Development of Socotra, Aden, Federal Government Mission Report.

Burrowes R.

1987 : The Yemen Arab Republic: The Politics of Development, 1962-1986, Boulder, Westview Press.

Casson L.

1989 : The Periplus Maris Erythraei, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

Doe B.

1992 : Socotra: Island of Tranquility, London, Immel Publishing.

Dresch P.

1989 : Tribes, Government and History in Yemen, London, Clarendon.

Elie S.

2008 : “The Waning of Soqotra’s Pastoral Community: Political Incorporation as Social Transformation”, Human Organization, 67:3, 335-45.

2006a : “Soqotra: South Arabia’s strategic gateway and symbolic playground”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 33:2, 131-60.

2006b : The Waning of a Pastoralist Community: An Ethnographic Exploration of Soqotra as a Transitional Social Formation, D.Phil Dissertation, University of Sussex.

2005 : “Hadiboh: From Peripheral Village to Emerging City”, Chroniques Yéménites, 12:56‑81.

Habermas J.

1994 : “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State”, in A. Gutman (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Halliday F.

1974 : Arabia without Sultans, Penguin, New York.

1979 : “Yemen’s Unfinished Revolution: Socialism in the South”, MERIP Reports, 81 (October).

1990 : Revolution and Foreign Policy: The Case of South Yemen 1967- 1987, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

1979 : “Yemen’s Unfinished Revolution: Socialism in the South”, MERIP Reports, 81 (October)

Ho E.

2006 : Graves of Tarim: Genealogy and Mobility across the Indian Ocean, Berkeley, University of California Press.

Hunter F. M. and C. W. H. Sealy

1909 : An Account of the Arab Tribes in the Vicinity of Aden, London, Darf Publications.

Ingrams D. L. (eds.)

1993 : Records of the Yemen. Vols. 1-15, England, Archives Edition.

Ismael T. and J. Ismael

1986 : P.D.R. Yemen: Politics, Economics and Society, London, Frances Pinter.

Jacob E.

1923 : Kings of Arabia, London, Mills & Boon Limited.

Lackner  H.

1985 : P.D.R. Yemen: Outpost of Socialist Development in Arabia, London, Ithaca Press.

Mundy M.

1995 : Domestic Government: Kinship, Community and Polity in North Yemen, London, I.B. Tauris.

Naumkin V.

1993 : Island of the Phoenix: An Ethnographic Study of the People of Socotra, Reading, Ithaca Press.

Rawls J.

1996 : Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press.

Robin J.

1997 : « Les Royaumes Combattants », in Yémen: Au Pays de la Reine de Saba, Paris, Flammarion, p. 180-187.

Al-Saqqaf A-B.

1999 : “The Yemeni Unity: Crisis in Integration”, in R. Levau, F. Mermier, and U. Steinback (eds.), Le Yemen Contemporain, Paris, Karthala, p. 141-159.

Schwedler J.

2002 : “Democratization in the Arab world? Yemen’s Aborted Opening”, Journal of Democracy, 13:4, 48-55.

Seif H.

2005 : “The Accursed Minority: The Ethno-Cultural Persecution of al-Akhdam in the Republic of Yemen”, Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 2:1.

Serjeant R.

1992 : “The Coastal Population of Socotra”, in B. Doe Socotra: Island of Tranquility, London, Immel.

Stookey R.

1982 : South Yemen: A Marxist Republic in South Arabia, Boulder, Westview.

Stork J.

1973 : “Socialist Revolution in Arabia: A Report from the People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen”, MERIP Reports, 15: 11-19

Tarbush Q.

2003 : Ta/twîr ni/zâm al-sul/ta al-ma/halliyya fî al-jumhuriyya al-yamaniyya [Development of the Local Authority System in the Republic of Yemen], Taizz, Yemen, Maktabat al-‘Urwa al-Wuthqa.

vom Bruck G.

2005 : Islam, Memory, and Morality in Yemen: Ruling Families in Transition, New York, Palgrave.

Weir S.

2007 : A Tribal Order: Politics and Law in the Mountains of Yemen, Austin, University of Texas Press.

Wellsted J.

1835 : “Memoir on the Island of Socotra”, Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London, 5: 129-229

World Bank

2007 : Yemen Development Policy Review, Washington, DC, World Bank.

2006 : Republic of Yemen Country Social Analysis, Washington DC, World Bank.

1999 : Yemen – Country Assistance Strategy 1999, Wash. DC, World Bank.

1995 : Republic of Yemen: Dimensions of Economic Adjustment and Structural Reform, Washington, DC, World Bank.

1979 : People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen: A Review of Economic and Social Development, Washington, DC, The World Bank.

Haut de page

Notes

1  The above part of this paragraph is based on archive documents collected in Doreen and Leila Ingrams (1993 vol. 4: p. 160-185).

2  If the behavior of Soqotra’s last Sultan (‘Isâ bin ‘Alî 1952-1967) is any guide, then administrative neglect was the modus operandi vis-à-vis Mahra. Indeed, the Sultan seemed to have been, as one British report puts it, “careless of his responsibilities in Mahra country … [, as] he rarely if ever visits the mainland and does nothing to foster the loyalty of his subjects there.” The British were guilty of similar neglect vis-à-vis both Mahra and Soqotra, which were left out of the advisory residency system introduced in the Eastern Protectorate since the 1930s. It was only when the oil company, Petroleum Concessions Limited, sought in the 1950s an oil prospecting lease for the Mahra region that an “Advisory Treaty” was signed in 1954. The latter would have established a formal administrative system in Mahra and Soqotra similar to that of the Qu‘aytî and Kathîrî Sultanates. However, it was never operationalized, as the Sultan refused to sign the oil exploration agreement presented by the British. (For details, see Ingrams 1993, vol. 12, p. 585-611; vol. 15, p. 749-61).

3  The term “foreigner” has a long and complicated genealogy in Soqotra. It was, and still is, part of an enduring curiosity among researchers and Soqotrans, concerning the ethnic origins and social categorizations of its first inhabitants and their progeny. The islanders have formulated their own division based on a cultural-spatial distinction: Those who considered themselves the indigenous inhabitants prioritized a territorial self‑conception rooted in a detailed knowledge of, and keen attachment to, clan geography, which induced a sensibility vis-à-vis spatial location of people as an index of relative cultural authenticity. Accordingly, the hinterland was the domain of indigenous Soqotrans, while the coast was that of those with foreign origins. This was a means to preserve their cultural autonomy and land ownership from their political overlords. The latter were mostly coastal residents who, in contrast, privileged a genealogical self-definition that preserved their exclusive status distinction, which was used to legitimize their rule. (For details see Elie 2006b: chapter 3).

4  In contrast to the Zaidy sâda of north Yemen who considered themselves a spiritual  aristocracy of the learned and the exclusive custodian of the faith’s doctrinal heritage as well as the hereditary rulers of the political realm (see vom Bruck 2005); and the Sufi sâda in Hadramawt who were ritual specialists and spiritual intermediaries whose veneration imparted blessing (baraka) to their followers (see Ho 2006); the ashrâf in Soqotra seemed to have been mostly illiterate, and thus did not have any pedagogical function, as scholars, vis-à-vis the population, but were primarily regarded as possessing magical powers and whose protection services (i.e., to ward off inauspicious forces and signs) were under the exclusive patronage of the Sultan (see Elie 2006b:chapter 6).

5  Parts of the above paragraph are based on personal communication with Soqotri ethno-linguist Dr. Miranda Morris. Worthy of note, is that in Soqotra, the akhdâm constituted a transitory class of self-indentured laborers, and never became an ethno-culturally based occupational caste subjected to social exclusion, as was, and still is, the case on mainland Yemen. (See Seif 2005.) However, it is the muwalladîn, who seemed to have inherited the social condition of the akhdâm on mainland Yemen (see section on Socialist period below).

6 Contrary to current recollection of the name “saqâ/tirâ”, as designating all Soqotrans, it was used exclusively to refer to (i) those who had to pay the full taxes of butter-oil and goat / sheepskins to the Sultan by those who paid in dates, or who were absolved from this tax; and (ii) to all the bedouins of the west who were seen as the “aboriginals” of the island. Initially, it was not a term of respect or admiration. This contrasts sharply with the recent recuperation of the term as a positive marker of islanders’ authentic ethno-cultural identity. (Based on personal correspondence with Dr. Miranda Morris).

7  In Yemen, muwallad (muwalladîn pl.) refers to someone born of intermarriage between an Arab (Yemeni) father and a non-Arab mother. In Soqotra, it is used exclusively to refer to the population of African-descent, in spite of the fact that there are Soqotrans of mixed Omani and Emirati origins. Since the end of the socialist period, the term is used as a euphemism for a manumitted social status marker that is evocative of an ethno‑cultural distinction, if not social exclusion. For further discussion of this social category in Yemen see Ho (2006: chapter 8).

8  This paranoia of sovereignty was symbolized in the State Security Law adopted in 1975, which made it an “an offense for a Yemeni to speak with a non-Yemeni without official approval” (Halliday 1990: 228). This political gag on the citizenry, or this “anti-fraternization” injunction, was also operational in Soqotra, as I was told by local informants.

9  The intifâ/dât were initially a land redistribution instrument deployed by politically organized landless peasants against rural feudal landlords in South Yemen after the revolution and prior to the adoption of the second Agrarian Reform Law in November 1970. It was subsequently used in different sectors (e.g., fishing) by the political leadership of the state as a means of encouraging mass demonstrations in support of policy changes. (See Stork 1973: 11-19; Halliday 1979: 13; Ismael and Ismael 1986:83-88).

10   These initial decrees sought not only to replace the feudal practices of the Imamate’s tribal cooptation strategy (e.g., hostage-taking and the allocation of tax-farming privileges); but also to mobilize tribes on behalf of the state in its civil war with supporters of the previous regime. Since the end of the civil war in 1970, the Tribal Affairs Authority seemed to have played an essential role (which has yet to be studied) in the consolidation of a state incorporated tribalism; and its institutional evolution, through a series of governmental decrees, mirrors the shifting political relations between state and tribes. (See Ministry of Interior brochure: Ma/sla/hat shu‘ûn al-qabâ’il: /hâdiran wa mustaqbalan). Today, it has 25 branches throughout the country with a budget of one and a half billion Yemeni Rials to be distributed to tribal sheikhs as state loyalty-inducing subsidies.

11  The delay in introducing the ni/zâm al-mashâyikh was due to the institutional inertia generated by the negotiated unification of the Northern and Southern Yemeni states, and the resulting tense political stalemate between the political leadership of the two former states. Consequently, the two divergent administrative traditions merely coexisted and were not integrated until after the civil war of 1994.

12  I am referring to the set of regulatory mechanisms (qawâ‘id) in relations among tribes: shûrâ (consultation between tribal members), aqd (inter-tribal protection agreement), baya (oath of allegiance between tribal sheikh and tribesmen), the feud (thâr) and the payment of blood money (diya), among others. These are neither among the traditional governance nor of conflict resolution institutions of Soqotrans. For details see Weir (2007: 143‑225).

13  However, in the fall of 2008, the Hadiboh Local Council members successfully petitioned the Governor of Hadramawt to replace the General Director from the mainland with a Soqotran. As a result, Soqotra is the first district to have appointed locally a General Director. However, given the absence of an amended Local Authority Law that would allow local citizens to elect directly the General Director – as envisioned in Article 161 of the Law – the appointment of a Soqotran as General Director is merely evidence of individual political mobility and is unlikely to remedy the structural contradiction in the local governance system.

14  In anticipation of the selection of Soqotra as a UNESCO World Natural Heritage Site, which occurred in July 2008, the Government of Yemen adopted a Cabinet Decree no. 49 on 12 February 2008, which called for “Mobilizing the necessary funding for setting up an effective institutional and management structure for the Soqotra Archipelago.” A committee made up of seven ministries was mandated to prepare a proposal on the establishment of “a national entity responsible to plan and coordinate all developments, investments and economic activities” on the Archipelago. The committee is expected to submit its report to the Cabinet for review and approval in 2009.  

15  In the summer of 2009, the Ministry of Culture presented a proposal entitled, “Project for the Establishment of a Network of Cultural Development Centers in Various Districts of the Republic of Yemen.” These centers, which will cover all of the districts of Yemen (333), will promote a range of socio-cultural activities as part ofnational cultural integration strategy. Each center will spread a culture of reading; promote traditional handicrafts; develop tourism-friendly local communities; provide a public forum for cultural events; raise awareness about local environmental conservation; encourage the preservation of local cultural-historical heritage, etc.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Serge D. Elie, « Soqotra: The historical formation of a communal polity », Chroniques yéménites, 16 | 2010, 31-55.

Référence électronique

Serge D. Elie, « Soqotra: The historical formation of a communal polity », Chroniques yéménites [En ligne], 16 | 2010, mis en ligne le 12 juillet 2010, consulté le 24 octobre 2017. URL : http://cy.revues.org/1766 ; DOI : 10.4000/cy.1766

Haut de page

Auteur

Serge D. Elie

Has a DPhil in social anthropology from the University of Sussex, UK, and is currently an independent researcher. He is preparing a manuscript entitled “Soqotra: A Pastoral Community in Transition.”

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

Licence Creative Commons
Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.

Haut de page
  • Logo Centre français d’Archéologie et de Sciences Sociales
  • Logo Institut de recherches et d'études sur le monde arabe et musulman
  • Logo Ministère des Affaires étrangères et européennes
  • Logo CNRS - Institut des sciences humaines et sociales
  • Revues.org